Latest News

Arizona voters are weighing ballot measures that restrict transgender athletes in sports and tighten voter identification requirements—both proxies for broader national debates about institutional authority, parental rights, and election administration that will shape Republican priorities heading into 2024.

Arizona's film tax incentive program faces legal questions about whether it constitutes an improper subsidy of private enterprise using public revenue. Conservative lawmakers are divided on whether the credits represent sound economic development or corporate welfare.

State legislatures across the nation are advancing measures to prevent foreign legal systems and principles from influencing American court decisions, asserting that U.S. courts must apply only American constitutional law and statutory authority.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement has identified approximately 450,000 unaccompanied migrant minors who entered the country during the Biden administration, prompting renewed scrutiny of border policies and federal custody procedures.

General Motors agreed to pay $220 million to settle allegations that its OnStar platform collected and sold customer location data without explicit consent. The case raises fundamental questions about corporate privacy practices and what authority companies claim over personal information in the digital age.

Multiple state legislatures are moving forward with legislation designed to prevent the application of foreign legal systems and international law within their borders, reasserting state constitutional supremacy over external legal frameworks.

Election integrity hinges on transparency. Maricopa County's ballot processing procedures reveal where Arizona's election administration succeeds—and where it still falls short of what voters deserve to verify independently.

Congress has repeatedly introduced the Sunshine Protection Act to make daylight saving time permanent year-round. The proposal raises questions about federal authority, state control, and whether permanent DST actually benefits Americans.

As states and school districts consider new bond measures to address college affordability and student debt, taxpayers face an expanding bill that extends far beyond those who benefit from higher education spending. The debate reveals a fundamental question: should public funds subsidize individual educational choices?

Across the country, voters in cities and counties are deciding whether to approve sales tax increases earmarked for police departments and emergency services. These ballot initiatives reveal a fundamental disagreement between taxpayers and their elected representatives about funding priorities and government performance.

Multiple state attorneys general filed suit against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development over new federal housing policy guidelines that condition grant funding on compliance with gender-ideology requirements. The case raises fundamental questions about federal spending conditions and state sovereignty.

Arizona has joined a legal challenge against federal administration of Colorado River water allocation, raising fundamental questions about state sovereignty and water rights in the West. The lawsuit centers on how federal authorities interpret and enforce century-old compacts that divide the river among seven states.

Cities and counties across America are raising local sales taxes at an accelerating rate, placing an outsized burden on working-class households that spend larger portions of income on taxed goods and services. Conservative policymakers argue these levies bypass voter scrutiny and shift costs downward to those least able to absorb them.

A coalition of Democratic state attorneys general has sued the Department of Housing and Urban Development, demanding that federal housing funds be distributed with requirements tied to gender ideology programming. The lawsuit centers on whether HUD can condition housing assistance on compliance with specific social policy mandates.

A growing coalition of state attorneys general is moving to block a major Hollywood media merger, citing consolidation concerns that cross traditional partisan lines. The development signals renewed scrutiny of media industry consolidation at the state level.